Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Chiara Mussida <cmussida@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: mlogtest after mlogit |

Date |
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:52:35 +0200 |

Dear Nick, thanks, I did not get your point before. Here there is the mlogit command I typed: mlogit transition male_unmarried female_married female_unmarried age agesq ncomp child northw northe centre Ubenef edu1 edu2 health city qu1nolav qu2nolav qu3nolav nopersincnolav noothersineq qu1ot qu2ot qu3ot if age>=15 & age<=64, b(3) covariates: 3 interaction variables (gender*martal status). age and individual age squared, number of household components as continuous variables. child: dummy variable for the presence of children, then 8 dummies (labels are clear). qu1nolav qu2nolav qu3nolav are quintiles for not labour income distribution (qu4 is the base) nopersincnolav noothersineq dummies for absence of not labour income and income from other household memebers, respectively qu1ot qu2ot qu3ot quintiles for income of other household members distribution (qu4 is the base) The multinomial logit estimates refer to individuals aged between 15 and 64. On 24 October 2011 15:34, Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> wrote: > The exact -mlogit- command you typed is what anyone wanting to diagnose your problem would want to see. No one is asking for "the file", whatever that is. > > As said, there are different versions of -mlogtest-, as -findit mlogtest- reveals. Naming the authors does not discriminate between them. > > I've now tried and failed twice to elicit from you what should have been provided in your original post. At this point I leave you to whatever help other people can provide given your incomplete question. > > Nick > n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk > > Chiara Mussida > > I cannot share the file with all statalister! > > Sure mlogtest is typewritten and I did not gave you this information, > not for being frammentary but because I engenously thought it was not > relevato: i'm so sorry! Now I got it: the program is typewritten by J. > Scott Long and Jeremy Freese. > > > On 24 October 2011 14:13, Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> wrote: >> You still don't give the exact -mlogit- command you typed. >> >> If (a) you can reproduce this problem with a dataset accessible to all, and/or (b) you can spell out exact commands visible to all, it stands a better chance of being solved. Trying to solve the problem without (a) is difficult enough, but we still lack even the second, (b). >> >> In addition, on checking I find that you have not explained that -mlogtest- is a user-written command (versions in STB and various websites) and you have not explained which version you are using. The authors of -mlogtest- are not active members of Statalist, so you are reliant on people understanding a user-written command they have not written. >> >> Please re-read the Statalist FAQ before posting. By posting fragmentary questions with incomplete information you are making any attempts to help you frustratingly difficult. >> >> Nick >> n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk >> >> Chiara Mussida >> >> Thanks Nick. I'm pleased to clarify the points you raised: >> 1) yes, the categories are 9 at the end, because the outcome >> transition=0 is replaceb completely by the other categories. >> 2)I didn't do anything between mlogit - stata command for multinomial >> logit estimates - and the related mlogtest. Nonetheless mlogtest works >> only after mlogit. >> >> Chiara >> >> On 24 October 2011 13:20, Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> wrote: >> >>> I don't understand Muhammad's first comment, which requires a change of the data, or indeed why Chiara even tried it out. >>> >>> In broad terms, Stata [sic] is having difficulties reconciling different information. >>> >>> That needs to be explored by looking at what you have said to Stata, through input of data and commands. There is little information in your posts to let anyone help you. >>> >>> First off, you say that there are 9 categories, but in principle there could be 10, according to your -generate- and -replace- statements, but there could be fewer than that depending on values of variables such as -UE- and on whether later -replace- commands overwrite the results of earlier commands. >>> >>> Second, and more important: What was the -mlogit- command? Did you do anything to your data between -mlogit- and -mlogtest-? >>> >>> Nick >>> n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk >>> >>> >>> Muhammad Anees >>> >>> Your test is offered by -wald- option after -mlogtest-. Hope this >>> gives you what you needed. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Chiara Mussida <cmussida@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks, unfortanately the problem remains also with recode >>> >>> On 24 October 2011 12:13, Muhammad Anees <anees@aneconomist.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> try with -recode 0=1 if UE==1- for all your categories, the problem >>>>> seems to be because -replace- might not have created the relevant >>>>> categories. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Chiara Mussida <cmussida@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> I run I mlogit with a dependent variables for 9 outcome categories. As >>>>>> postestimation checks I tried to carry out a test for the equality of >>>>>> coefs across categories: mlogtest, c >>>>>> >>>>>> before despalying the output of thus check, STATA (version 12) says: >>>>>> mlogtest, c >>>>>> >>>>>> Problem determining number of categories. >>>>>> >>>>>> what does it mean? my dependent variable, transition, is built as follows: >>>>>> ge transition=0 >>>>>> replace transition=1 if UE==1 >>>>>> replace transition=2 if UN==1 >>>>>> replace transition=3 if UU==1 >>>>>> replace transition=4 if EU==1 >>>>>> replace transition=5 if EN==1 >>>>>> replace transition=6 if EE==1 >>>>>> replace transition=7 if NE==1 >>>>>> replace transition=8 if NU==1 >>>>>> replace transition=9 if NN==1 >>>>>> >>>>>> where each outcome is a transition or permanence in each labour market >>>>>> state (namely, Unemployment, Employment, Non labour force) >>> > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- Chiara Mussida PhD candidate Doctoral school of Economic Policy Catholic University, Piacenza (Italy) * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: mlogtest after mlogit***From:*Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**Re: st: mlogtest after mlogit***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: mlogtest after mlogit***From:*Chiara Mussida <cmussida@gmail.com>

**Re: st: mlogtest after mlogit***From:*Muhammad Anees <anees@aneconomist.com>

**Re: st: mlogtest after mlogit***From:*Chiara Mussida <cmussida@gmail.com>

**Re: st: mlogtest after mlogit***From:*Muhammad Anees <anees@aneconomist.com>

**RE: st: mlogtest after mlogit***From:*Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**Re: st: mlogtest after mlogit***From:*Chiara Mussida <cmussida@gmail.com>

**RE: st: mlogtest after mlogit***From:*Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**Re: st: mlogtest after mlogit***From:*Chiara Mussida <cmussida@gmail.com>

**RE: st: mlogtest after mlogit***From:*Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: rolling and ts operators** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: mlogtest after mlogit** - Previous by thread:
**RE: st: mlogtest after mlogit** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: mlogtest after mlogit** - Index(es):