Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: qladder
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: qladder
Date
Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:38:44 +0100
It's enough that some are real zeros for the transformations concerned
to be invalid. That doesn't rule out using link functions that indulge
zeros.
Nick
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Ozgur Ozdemir
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Nic,
> It seems you are right, i have too many zeros but some of them are real zeros, and some of them are missing values. i am not sure how I can handle it.
>
>
>
>
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>>
>> The implication is that you have zeros in your data so that the
>> transformations not plotted are not computable for all values. It is
>> thus not clear that you are missing anything that could be useful.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Ozgur Ozdemir
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > when I use the qladder command, it does show only four graphs including cubic, square, identity and square root. but does not show i.e inverse, 1/square and some others. Is there any way that I can get others graphed?
>> >
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/