Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: qladder


From   Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: qladder
Date   Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:38:44 +0100

It's enough that some are real zeros for the transformations concerned
to be invalid. That doesn't rule out using link functions that indulge
zeros.

Nick

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Ozgur Ozdemir
<ozdemirozgur@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Nic,
> It seems you are right, i have too many zeros but some of them are real zeros, and some of them are missing values. i am not sure how I can handle it.
>
>
>
>
>> From: njcoxstata@gmail.com
>> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
>>
>> The implication is that you have zeros in your data so that the
>> transformations not plotted are not computable for all values. It is
>> thus not clear that you are missing anything that could be useful.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Ozgur Ozdemir
>> <ozdemirozgur@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > when I use the qladder command, it does show only four graphs including cubic, square, identity and square root.   but does not show i.e inverse, 1/square and some others. Is there any way that I can get others graphed?
>> >

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index