Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: R. notation


From   "Bontempo, Daniel E" <deb193@ku.edu>
To   "'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: R. notation
Date   Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:38:09 +0000

I get slightly different results in xtmelogit with "|| Subj:" versus "|| _all R.Subj", and the differences increase if there is a 2nd crossed random effect.

Do these two notations specify the same model? ... but the differences stem from Laplacian approximation?

Also, I find the i. and c. notation documented under "fvvarlist", but where can I find documentation discussing R. notation?

Thanks

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index