I guess you will need to wait until release and until someone does
these comparisons.
As for -gllamm- (SSC), the questions really are (1) which commands if
any that -gllamm- uses will be faster and (2) which things that
-gllamm- does will be faster done by official Stata commands.
Nick
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 1:19 PM, William Robert Buchanan
<William@williambuchanan.net> wrote:
> I was just looking through the MP performance report on Stata's website
> (http://stata.com/statamp/report.pdf) and was wondering if anyone had any
> idea regarding performance with the new version of the software. Like a few
> other users, I would love nothing more than to get rid of the SEM software
> that I have if I can fit the models in Stata. That being said, I was
> wondering what kind of efficiency gains there are for the different flavors
> of Stata MP with respect to fitting - sem - models? I think it would also
> be great if there was information available comparing the processing time of
> the different SEM software (i.e., EQS, M-Plus, LISREL, AMOS, etc...) with
> the - sem - command in Stata 12.
>
> I was also wondering if there have been any improvements to the way Stata 12
> will handle - gllamm - compared to previous releases.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
