Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: rreg v.s regress


From   lreine ycenna <lreine.ycenna@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: rreg v.s regress
Date   Mon, 16 May 2011 12:14:32 +0100

sorry - I meant to say that the coefficients show different signs
under rreg and regress.

On 16 May 2011 12:08, lreine ycenna <lreine.ycenna@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The rreg and regress commands produce different regression results.
> Since the rreg and regress are both from M-estimators,I thought I
> could use rreg as substitute for regress, with rreg being a preferred
> method (outliers). But I'm not sure anymore. Can anyone enlighten me
> on this issue?
>
> Thanks.
>
> lreine.
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index