Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Why F-test with regression output |

Date |
Wed, 04 May 2011 23:15:00 -0500 |

At 04:19 PM 5/4/2011, Steven Samuels wrote:

Nick, I've seen examples where every regression coefficient wasnon-significant (p>0.05), but the F-test rejected the hypothesisthat all were zero. This can happen even when the predictors areuncorrelated. So I don't consider the test superfluous.Steve

I also find the omnibus test helpful.

------------------------------------------- Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463 HOME: (574)289-5227 EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Why F-test with regression output***From:*John Antonakis <John.Antonakis@unil.ch>

**References**:**st: Why F-test with regression output***From:*Nick Winter <nwinter@virginia.edu>

**Re: st: Why F-test with regression output***From:*Steven Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: re: st: Interaction of ANOVA contrast (e.g. linear/quadratic trend) and another Factor Variable?** - Next by Date:
**re: st: Interaction of ANOVA contrast (e.g. linear/quadratic trend) and another Factor Variable?** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Why F-test with regression output** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Why F-test with regression output** - Index(es):