Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Antwort: st: Putting Coefficients in the same column with esttab/estout


From   Johannes Geyer <JGeyer@diw.de>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Antwort: st: Putting Coefficients in the same column with esttab/estout
Date   Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:26:27 +0200

did you try the option -order-?

esttab ... , order(lagvar1 avg5fvar lagvar2 avg5gvar...)

Johannes




----------------------
Johannes Geyer
Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin)
German Institute for Economic Research 
Department of Public Economics
DIW Berlin
Mohrenstraße 58
10117 Berlin
Tel: +49-30-89789-258

owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu schrieb am 28/04/2011 16:55:52:

> Dear all Stata users,
> I have just finished running a lot of estimates that i have saved on
> my computer with the command estwrite (after having stored them with
> estimates store). Now it comes to make some tables, but with both the
> commands esttab and estout I cannot let some coefficients stay in the
> same column. I can be more precise with an example. What i get with
> either esttab (or even estout) is:
> 
> 
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                       (1)             (2)             (3)
> (4)             (5)             (6)
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> lagpolity1          0.014***
>                   (0.000)
> lagpolity2          0.027***
>                   (0.001)
> avg5polity1
> 0.015***
> 
> (0.001)
> avg5polity2
> 0.028***
> 
> (0.001)
> lagfh1                              0.054***
>                                   (0.002)
> lagfh2                              0.123***
>                                   (0.002)
> avg5fh_opp1
>              0.045***
> 
>            (0.002)
> avg5fh_opp2
>              0.114***
> 
>            (0.002)
> lagchga1                                            0.112***
>                                                   (0.007)
> lagchga2                                            0.347***
>                                                   (0.007)
> avg5chga1
>                              0.116***
> 
>                            (0.007)
> avg5chga2
>                              0.352***
> 
>                            (0.008)
> 
> 
> 
> But what I'd like to get is the coefficients of all those that I call
> avg5 below the coefficients of the lagged vars. In other words,
> something like:
> 
> 
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                       (1)             (2)             (3)
> (4)             (5)             (6)
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> lagpolity1          0.014***
>                   (0.000)
> lagpolity2          0.027***
>                   (0.001)
> avg5polity1        0.015***
>                   (0.001)
> avg5polity2        0.028***
>                   (0.001)
> lagfh1                              0.054***
>                                   (0.002)
> lagfh2                              0.123***
>                                   (0.002)
> avg5fh_opp1                         0.045***
>                                   (0.002)
> avg5fh_opp2                         0.114***
>                                   (0.002)
> lagchga1                                            0.112***
>                                                   (0.007)
> lagchga2                                            0.347***
>                                                   (0.007)
> avg5chga1                                          0.116***
>                                                    (0.007)
> avg5chga2                                          0.352***
>                                                    (0.008)
> 
> 
> But obviously I do not want to run all the regressions again (it'd 
> take ages!!).
> 
> Anyone can help me?
> 
> Thanks to all of you for your time and consideration,
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Emanuele.
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index