Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Areg, absorb

From   emanuele mazzini <>
Subject   Re: st: Areg, absorb
Date   Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:07:05 +0200

Then do you think I can keep the estimates for the dummies now and
drop them later on, when I'll be exporting the resulting table in
another format (for instance, latex)?

Thank you.

2011/4/11 Nick Cox <>:
> I think this is likely to be well addressed by using the -estimates-
> suite of commands, in which you use -estimates table- with -keep()- or
> -drop()- as needed after -regress-.
> There is likely to be something similar with various user-written
> commands. People who use any of those commands are likely to have
> precise advice.
> Nick
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:32 PM, emanuele mazzini
> <> wrote:
>> I am trying to work out a regression with panel data in which I have
>> to control for country1, country2 and year.
>> I tried to ran a regression after creating a dummy for all three of
>> them and obviously in the result Stata reports the estimates of all
>> the dummies I created which I do not want to show in the output of the
>> regression. I tried to get the same result with the command: areg...,
>> absorb(varname)  but the point is that areg does not allow me to
>> include more than one variable, and in this case I would need three.
>> Hence, my brief question is: is there a way to include in the
>> regression the fixed effects for country1, country2 and year without
>> Stata showing all the coefficients of the dummies I create?
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *
> *
> *

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index