Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: xtregar, fe lbi


From   Scott Merryman <scott.merryman@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: xtregar, fe lbi
Date   Tue, 5 Apr 2011 19:50:24 -0500

See  http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2010-09/msg01406.html


Scott

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Marie-Claire Robitaille-Blanchet
<marie-claire.robitaille-blanchet@uwa.edu.au> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to use the command xtregar, fe lbi but I am unsure how to interpret the modified Bhargava et al. Durbin-Watson and Baltagi-Wu LBI...
>
> The results I obtain are:
>
> modified Bhargava et al. Durbin-Watson = .97208012
> Baltagi-Wu LBI = 1.7745588
>
> I have 165 obs and 60 groups.
>
> Does anyone know how to interpret those results? Any reference I can use?
>
> Thanks
>
> Marie-Claire
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index