Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Propensity score matching with latent outcome?


From   Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Propensity score matching with latent outcome?
Date   Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:45:36 -0500

Jenny or Anders Olsson <phd.olsson@gmail.com>:
What command would you use if you had an experimental sample instead
of a matched sample?
Does it accept pweights?
If so, you may want to consider a reweighting estimator instead of a
matching estimator--the former is demonstrably more stable and more
efficient, but uses exactly the same assumptions about the utility of
Propensity Scores.

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Anders Olsson <phd.olsson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Can I conduct Propensity Score Matching in Stata using a latent
> outcome variable (i.e. the final outcome variable is latent, not the treatment)?
> If so, how is the best way to do this?
>
> Thank you in advance!
>
> Jenny Hansson
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index