Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: standard errors for conditional predicted probabilities after biprobit


From   Inga van den Bongard <ivdb@uni-mannheim.de>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   st: standard errors for conditional predicted probabilities after biprobit
Date   Thu, 02 Dec 2010 19:43:02 +0100

Dear all,

I am estimating a recursive bivariate probit model and calculate the conditional predicted probabilities. As prvalue or prgen does not work after biprobit, I tried predictnl estimate=(binormal(xb(#1),xb(#2),$rho)/normal(xb(#2)), se(se) in order to get standard errors of the conditional predicted probabilities. Unfortunately, the delta method standard errors seem to be extremely (too?) high (compared to an ordinary probit). Is it possible that the delta method does not perform very well in this context?

Can you recommend a way to calculate standard errors and/or confidence intervals for conditional predicted probabilities?

Many thanks!

Best

Inga



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index