Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
DE SOUZA Eric <eric.de_souza@coleurope.eu> |

To |
"'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: re:st: Insignificant coefficient in prediction |

Date |
Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:32:47 +0100 |

The example I give my students is a regression of y on x1 and x2 where the corelation between x1 and x2 in 0.99... Both coefficients (on x1 and x2) are insignificantly different from zero. But the R2 is very high. Eric de Souza BE-8000 Brugge (Bruges) Belgium -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Christopher F Baum Sent: 01 December 2010 20:27 To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: re:st: Insignificant coefficient in prediction <> Mike said sysuse auto, clear reg mpg weight length // length is not significant predict mpgh, xb The predicted values use all coefficients including the coefficient of 'length' even if it is not significant. Well, of course. yhat is the linear combination X*b. If you arbitrarily leave out one or more of the terms in that linear combination, you are not going to get predictions of the regression surface. For in-sample predictions, the mean error will not be zero in that instance, as it will be for regression with a constant term. So if you want a point prediction, you use all of the estimated coefficients, whether or not you can precisely estimate them... Consider regressing y on x and (x + epsilon), where x is highly correlated with y. The predictions of that model, for small epsilon, will have a very high R^2, but the individual standard errors will be huge due to near-perfect collinearity. That does not suggest that you should use the naive model y = b0 (constant), though. KIt Kit Baum | Boston College Economics and DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**re:st: Insignificant coefficient in prediction***From:*Christopher F Baum <baum@bc.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**re:st: Insignificant coefficient in prediction** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: saving residuals for many regressions** - Previous by thread:
**re:st: Insignificant coefficient in prediction** - Next by thread:
**st: Fullname of variables in a model** - Index(es):