Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: size of cluster robust SEs relative to regular SEs |

Date |
Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:15:11 -0400 |

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:34 PM, David Quinn <dxquinnx@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks again, Stas. I fear that this small N problem is really > trapping me, then. > > I do notice that the most significant amount of fluctuation in > directionality occurs with a suite of dummy variables that were > constructed out of a categorical variable, wherein I excluded all but > one of the dummies to prevent perfect collinearity. Hence, by their > nature, each of the dummies in the suite contain more zeroes than > ones. Not sure if the fluctuation in that regard is natural or not. If those dummies are concentrated in particular clusters, then yes, you are in big trouble with them. In the extreme case, if you had cluster indicators, then you would have zero d.f.s to estimate variance. If your dummy spans say three clusters, then you have something like two degrees of freedom for that particular parameters (and a lousy variance estimator on top of it). If the dummies are scattered kinda randomly across clusters, then it is not that bad. -- Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: size of cluster robust SEs relative to regular SEs***From:*David Quinn <dxquinnx@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: size of cluster robust SEs relative to regular SEs***From:*David Quinn <dxquinnx@gmail.com>

**Re: st: size of cluster robust SEs relative to regular SEs***From:*Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com>

**Re: st: size of cluster robust SEs relative to regular SEs***From:*David Quinn <dxquinnx@gmail.com>

**Re: st: size of cluster robust SEs relative to regular SEs***From:*Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com>

**Re: st: size of cluster robust SEs relative to regular SEs***From:*David Quinn <dxquinnx@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: xtmixed command** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: xtmixed command** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: size of cluster robust SEs relative to regular SEs** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: size of cluster robust SEs relative to regular SEs** - Index(es):