Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: continuous interactions


From   Erum Ikramullah <eikramullah@childtrends.org>
To   "'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: continuous interactions
Date   Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:58:08 -0400

Sorry, I meant to say "continuousXcontinuous interactions"....

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Erum Ikramullah
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 3:52 PM
To: 'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'
Subject: st: continuous interactions

Hello all,

Does anyone have experience running a continuous Xc continuous interaction in a multinomial regression model?  I need some help interpreting the findings.  Any guidance you can give will be much appreciated.  

I have looked into this http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/faq/conconb.htm, but it seems like it might not be entirely appropriate as I am running mlogits.


Sincerely,

Erum Ikramullah
Senior Research Analyst
4301 Connecticut Avenue, NW 
Suite 350 
Washington, DC 20008
www.childtrends.org



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index