Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: factormat STATA 10


From   Anders Alexandersson <andersalex@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: factormat STATA 10
Date   Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:08:53 -0400

I would think that 4 observations are too few for factor analysis
regardless of the size of the underlying matrix.
What would be a meaningful result of factor analysis with 4 observations?
Maybe you instead want to use a 4*4 matrix with 88 observations, that
is, with option n(88)?

Anders
andersalex@gmail.com


On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:22 PM,  <baxa0002@umn.edu> wrote:
This is regarding factormat. I have an 88 by 88 co-variance matrix. In the
> n(#) I input n(4) as I have a panel of 88 firms and 4 years. I get the error
> message about too few observations.
>
> Is there anything I can do to get STATA to perform the factor analysis? If
> not, can someone point out exactly where STATA fails (e.g. is there a matrix
> that it cannot invert) so that I can figure a way around it. I went to the
> Stata 10 manual and it did not have any formulas for factor mat.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index