Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Kieran McCaul" <Kieran.McCaul@uwa.edu.au> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: RE: Reconstructing the distribution from interval data |

Date |
Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:12:31 +0800 |

... My first thought when reading Ronan's original post was "If people want to know how many procedures someone has performed in the last year, why don't they just ask them? Why do they group the responses in the questionnaire?" I suppose that by grouping the responses in the questionnaire, the authors are tacitly acknowledging that there will be a degree of error in recall of the exact number. If they had asked for the exact number, then I suspect the distribution would have displayed some evidence of this; a tendency to report 5, 10, 15, etc. That would still be better than grouping the responses in the questionnaire though. With regard to the zeros. I suppose there are going to be a small proportion of surgeons who have done a procedure in the past, but are not quite sure whether it was in the last year or not. So there is likely to be some misclassification error, but probably small, probably non-differential. -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Ronan Conroy Sent: Thursday, 9 September 2010 5:49 PM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: Re: st: RE: Reconstructing the distribution from interval data On 8 MFómh 2010, at 19:34, Austin Nichols wrote: > The ML approach seems preferable; for income data, see e.g. > http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/bocode/g/gbgfit.html > and if you assume a family of distributions for #procedures > (Poisson, maybe?), you can estimate those parameters the same way. Good point! A colleague has also pointed out that one frequency is known exactly: the number of physicians who did no procedures. This allows the calculation of a Poisson parameter. Calculating the expected frequencies within each of the categories allows some measure of goodness of fit. Ronán Conroy Associate Professor Division of Population Health Sciences ================================= rconroy@rcsi.ie Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Epidemiology Department, Beaux Lane House, Dublin 2, Ireland +353 (0)1 402 2431 +353 (0)87 799 97 95 +353 (0)1 402 2764 (Fax - remember them?) http://rcsi.academia.edu/RonanConroy P Before printing, think about the environment * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: RE: Reconstructing the distribution from interval data***From:*Ronan Conroy <rconroy@rcsi.ie>

**References**:**st: Reconstructing the distribution from interval data***From:*Ronan Conroy <rconroy@rcsi.ie>

**st: RE: Reconstructing the distribution from interval data***From:*"David Radwin" <dradwin@mprinc.com>

**Re: st: RE: Reconstructing the distribution from interval data***From:*Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com>

**Re: st: RE: Reconstructing the distribution from interval data***From:*Ronan Conroy <rconroy@rcsi.ie>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: RE: combining/integrating the results of -stepwise- and -mim- for variable selection after multiple imputation** - Next by Date:
**st: Problem identifying a specific value of a string variable** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: RE: Reconstructing the distribution from interval data** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: RE: Reconstructing the distribution from interval data** - Index(es):