Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st:Testing dependence in a 2x2 table for clustered observations


From   "Hoogendoorn, Adriaan" <A.Hoogendoorn@ggzingeest.nl>
To   "'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st:Testing dependence in a 2x2 table for clustered observations
Date   Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:20:12 +0200

Thank you Joseph for your suggestions. They put me on the right track.

It appears that if patients at clinics are either all treated or all untreated that I was wrong in my earlier comment that all procedures fail: Although xtlogit with fixed effects does not work, xtlogit with random effects seems to work fine, (and gives identical results as xtmelogit).

Thank you also for hinting me on clchi2.

Kind regards, Adriaan Hoogendoorn
GGZ inGeest Amsterdam





Dit e-mailbericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Als dit bericht niet voor u bestemd is, wordt u verzocht dit aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te vernietigen. Het is niet toegestaan de inhoud van dit bericht verder te verspreiden of te gebruiken. Voor meer informatie over GGZ inGeest: www.ggzingeest.nl.


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index