Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Stata vs Fortran


From   Tony <tchiang783@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Stata vs Fortran
Date   Wed, 1 Sep 2010 23:29:13 -0500

I think it was Edward Prescott who said there is no substitue for
spending a weekend with FORTRAN.  Stata is seriously underpowered but
no surprise there.  That's not what it's supposed to be used for.

Cheers,

Tony


On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Allan Reese (Cefas)
<allan.reese@cefas.co.uk> wrote:
> This discussion seems to have gone off topic, and stata.se (why hide
> behind pseudonym?) has not indicated what Fortran properties Stata,
> Mata, or any other language cannot replicate.  I would suggest that
> within any complex calculation (supercomputers, multiple processors have
> been mentioned), the overhead of learning how to read a formatted Ascii
> file into Fortran will be trivial.  It is also likely that the data file
> in Stata will contain variables not needed in the Fortran calculation.

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index