Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Using mifit after ice to get imputed values


From   Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Using mifit after ice to get imputed values
Date   Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:18:13 +0000 (GMT)

--- On Fri, 16/7/10, Ilke UNDER wrote:
> I am using Stata 10 to do multiple imputations with ice and
> want to draw point estimates combining the imputations created by
> ice. In a previous email (though it is 2006), it is advised to use
> uvis, miset and mifit to get the imputed values for the initial data
> set. Currently, I assume ice is more efficient since it also
> allows using predictors with missing values and shortens the overall
> procedure. But, I had problems using misplit (update for miset)
> followed by mifit to get the final imputed values combining the multiple
> imputations.

A lot has changed since than. The prefered tool for combining estimates
from imputed datasets with -ice- is now -mim- (-findit mim-). Also type
-findit ice- to find the latest SJ articles on both -ice- and -mim-.

Hope this helps,
Maarten

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------


      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index