Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: st: Subgroup analysis


From   "Clyde Schechter" <clyde.schechter@einstein.yu.edu>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: Re: st: Subgroup analysis
Date   Thu, 8 Jul 2010 06:33:01 -0700

Comparing the statistical significance of effects in two sub-populations
is rather perilous.

I have two suggestions.  First, since you have already done the
race-specific analyses, just look at the coefficients in the White and
African American subgroups, disregarding standard errors and p-values. 
Are the coefficients similar?  If so, you may well be simply finding a
lack of statistical power to detect in a subgroup of 600 subtle effects
that achieve statistical significance in your larger combined sample.

Second, and more formally, before even running the subgroup analyses, I
would have added race X predictor interaction terms to the model and then
tested the significance of those interaction terms.  If _they_ are not
significant, then the conclusion would be that your data do not provide
evidence of difference across races (which is not the same as evidence of
no difference across races).  If the interaction terms _are_ significant,
then the coefficients of those interaction terms give you estimates of the
cross-race differences in effects.

Hope this helps.

Clyde Schechter, MA MD
Associate Professor of Family & Social Medicine

Please note new e-mail address: clyde.schechter@einstein.yu.edu

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index