Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Ginis for negative net worth


From   Conor Hughes <cbhughes@uchicago.edu>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Ginis for negative net worth
Date   Mon, 5 Jul 2010 06:21:46 -0500

Hi Nora,
The general formula for the Gini index 1 - 2*int_0^1 Y(x)dx, where
Y(x) is your Lorenz curve.  The only way this can be greater than 1 is
if the integral is negative.  So, in your case, the Gini isn't really
appropriate, since 1 is defined as perfect inequality.  Anything
greater than 1 will make most economists very uncomfortable.  You
should take a look at this paper by Andreas Stich in the journal
Statistical Methods and Applications (Volume 5, Number 3) called
"Inequality and negative income."  I think it will give you some
helpful ideas for dealing with this.

Cheers,
Conor

On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Abdel Rahmen El Lahga
<rahmen.lahga@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Nora,
> Gini index as well as other inequality indices are defined for
> positive outcomes and can not applied for negatives observations.
> You have two alternatives:
> 1) use a trick (not so popular) proposed by Chen et al. (1982) in
> oxford economic paper (1982) page 473-478 (See also the comment by
> Berrebi and Silber in the same journal (1985 page 525-526) to deal
> with negative outcomes
> 2) You can use absolute gini index to avoid problems caused by
> negative income (but you should care about  different ethical
> judjements associated to absolute view of inequality)
> HTH
> AbdelRahmen
>
> 2010/7/5 Nora Müller <nora.mueller@uni-bamberg.de>:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I'm trying to calculate the gini coefficient for net worth (= financial
> > assets + real assets - debts) that has some negative values.
> > I do this using the command "inequal7" written by Philippe Van Kerm.
> >
> > I'm doing an international comparison and for Poland I get a Gini that is
> > 1.15. Can anyone help me with the interpretation?
> > Why can there be a gini greater than one?
> >
> > Thanks for your consideration,
> > Nora
> >
> >
> > --
> > *********************************************
> > Nora Müller, Dipl.-Soz.
> >
> > Faculty for Social and Economic Sciences
> > Chair of Sociology I
> > Otto-Friedrich-University Bamberg
> >
> > Fakultät Sozial- und  Wirtschaftswissenschaften
> > Lehrstuhl Soziologie I
> > Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg
> > Wilhelmsplatz 3
> > 96047 Bamberg
> >
> > Raum: 229
> > Tel. +49-951-863 3909
> > Fax. +49-951-863 2597
> > Email: nora.mueller@uni-bamberg.de
> > www: http://www.uni-bamberg.de/sowi/soziologie-i/
> >
> > http://gif-project.soziologie-blossfeld.de
> > *********************************************
> > *
> > *   For searches and help try:
> > *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> > *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> > *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> AbdelRahmen El Lahga
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



--
Conor Hughes
Mathematics and Economics
University of Chicago 2011

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index