Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: xtreg, fe and clustered standard errors at the aggregate level.


From   natasha agarwal <agarwana2@googlemail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   st: xtreg, fe and clustered standard errors at the aggregate level.
Date   Fri, 2 Jul 2010 09:35:33 +0100

Dear Everyone,

I am trying to estimate an augmented production function where am
attempting to measure the effect of aggregate variable (FDI in a
region) on micro units (productivity of domestic firms). I use an
unbalanced panel data which spans for 5 years and estimate the same
using a within estimator.

I cluster the standard errors at the regional level. However the
number of regions in the dataset is 30. However I have been reading
that the Stata cluster command developed by Liang and Zeger (1986)
takes care of correcting the standard errors using a robust covariance
estimator even when the cluster size is 10.

In this regard I wanted to know whether the xtreg, fe vce(cluster
region) adjusts the standard errors based on the formula developed by
Liang and Zeger (1986).

Liang and Zeger (1986), Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Generalized
Linear Models, Biometrika, Vol. 73, No. 1. (Apr., 1986), pp. 13-22.

Many thanks
Natasha
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index