Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: AW: problem with grqreg after qreg |

Date |
Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:45:40 +0200 |

<> " Then does it mean that grqreg will yield the same graph no matter it is run after 0.1 or 0.2 quantile regression?" Easy to find out: ************* webuse auto, clear qui forv i=1(2)9{ qreg price weight length turn foreign, q( `=`i'/10') grqreg weight, ci ols olsci name(mygr`i', replace) } gr combine mygr1 mygr3 mygr5 mygr7 mygr9 ************* So the answer is "Yes", and any -qreg- run immediately before the -grqreg- call is apparently sufficient. BTW, the command is user-written from -ssc-. HTH Martin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von xueliansharon Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Juli 2010 17:25 An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Betreff: st: problem with grqreg after qreg Hi all, In the following code, when I run grqreg after qreg, why do I get a curve instead of a point in this graph (say graph 1)? grqreg should plot the coefficient before weight for 0.5 quantile regression in my codes, which should be a point 3.933588 in the graph, so why does grqreg retrun a curve? The following are my codes: webuse auto, clear qreg price weight length turn foreign, quantile(0.5) grqreg weight, ci ols olsci Also, I check the coefficients of weight when running qreg for quantile 0.1, 0.2,0.3,...,0.9 respectively, and it seems like the coefficients before weight for each quantile regression are the same to the value in the graph1 (graph 1 is gotten by running grqreg after 0.5 quantile regression), that is, the coefficient before weight for 0.1 quantile regression is the same to the value in graph 1 for quantile 0.1, is this correct? Then does it mean that grqreg will yield the same graph no matter it is run after 0.1 or 0.2 quantile regression? So if I want to get a graph showing all the coefficients before weight for quantile 0.1,0.2,...,0.9 regression, should I just employ the graph plotted after quantile 0.5 (or 0.1 or any quantile) regression? Or should I employ the following codes? webuse auto, clear set seed 10101 sqreg price weight length foreign, quantile(0.1, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.75,0.8,0.9) reps(100) grqreg weight, ci ols olsci Hope to get your help. Thanks, Sharon -- View this message in context: http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/problem-with-grqreg-after-qreg-tp5243 782p5243782.html Sent from the Statalist mailing list archive at Nabble.com. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: Re: AW: problem with grqreg after qreg***From:*xueliansharon <xuelianstata@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: problem with grqreg after qreg***From:*xueliansharon <xuelianstata@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**AW: st: AW: Errror in cendif - tidotforsomersd(): 3499 tidottree() not found** - Next by Date:
**st: rbounds Hodges-Lehmann point estimates and ATT estimates** - Previous by thread:
**st: problem with grqreg after qreg** - Next by thread:
**st: Re: AW: problem with grqreg after qreg** - Index(es):