Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: What is Popularity? (with respect to R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...) |

Date |
Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:08:19 +0100 |

I agree. In fact, I'd say that there were several latent variables here. If popularity is the criterion, then Excel probably trumps all other programs, even focusing on statistical uses alone. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Michael N. Mitchell I think this is a very interesting, unique, and challenging endeavor. I think this is a classic issue of having a latent construct that we want to measure (popularity) and some easy measures lying around. So far, I have not seen a discussion of how we would define this latent variable of "popularity" of a statistical package. In terms of defining "popularity" some random thoughts are... 1. Number of "users" (but of course there are different kinds of "users"). 2. Number of copies "in use" (but of course there are different kinds of use, occasional vs. vs. daily). 3. Amount of use (people hours, publications completed). 4. Preferred utilization (I must use X, but I would prefer to use Y). 5. Quality ratings. I think that it would be useful to solicit discussion of how people would define "popularity" with respect to statistical packages. Then, each of the available measures could be assessed to the degree it reflects the underlying unmeasured idea of "popularity". On 2010-06-28 6.52 AM, Muenchen, Robert A (Bob) wrote: > At http://r4stats.com/popularity I have added plots, data, and/or > discussion of: > > 1. Scholarly impact of each package across the years > 2. The number of subscribers to some of the listservs > 3. How popular each package is among Google searches across the years > 4. Survey results from a Rexer Analytics poll > 5. Survey results from a KDnuggests poll > 6. A rudimentary analysis of the software skills that employers are > seeking > > Thanks very much to all the folks who helped on this project including: > John Fox, Marc Schwartz, Duncan Murdoch, Martin Weiss, John (Jiangtang) > HU, Andre Wielki, Kjetil Halvorsen, Dario Solari, Joris Meys, Keo > Ormsby, Karl Rexer, and Gregory Piatetsky-Shapiro. > > If anyone can think of other angles, please let me know. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: (New) Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...***From:*"Muenchen, Robert A (Bob)" <muenchen@utk.edu>

**st: What is Popularity? (with respect to R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...)***From:*"Michael N. Mitchell" <Michael.Norman.Mitchell@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: RE: (New) Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...** - Next by Date:
**AW: st: RE: (New) Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...** - Previous by thread:
**st: What is Popularity? (with respect to R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...)** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: (New) Popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata...** - Index(es):