Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: xtmelogit versus gllamm?


From   Anders Alexandersson <andersalex@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: xtmelogit versus gllamm?
Date   Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:45:52 -0400

The two commands, among other things, are compared in the book
"Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata". The book is
available in the Stata bookstore, see
http://www.stata.com/bookstore/mlmus2.html. For example, see section
6.7.2. We cannot comment on your "dramatically different results"
until you describe your models. One obvious difference is that gllamm
is a user-written command whereas xtmelogit is an official command.
But similar models will give similar results.

Anders Alexandersson
andersalex@gmail.com

On Jun 23, Jessi Bishop-royse <jessibishoproyse@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Good evening statalisters.  I have been looking into multilevel modeling with stata and have come to an impasse.  I cant figure out the difference between gllamm and xtmelogit.  I have run analyses in both and end up with dramatically different results.  Can anyone describe the differences between the two and why one would use one versus the other?  And what factors they use to make the decision which to use??

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index