Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: negative binomial model


From   Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: negative binomial model
Date   Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:03:41 +0000 (GMT)

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------


--- On Sun, 20/6/10, Mareike wrote:
> I want to analyze count data. Given that for several
> reasons the Poisson analysis showed to be inappropriate,
> my idea was to run a negative binomial model(using the
> command xtnbreg because I have panel data). But what
> happened was that Stata was giving me one iteration after
> the other (what appeared in the result window lokked like
> the following: 
> Iteration 14721:log likelihood = -53.558237  (not
> concave)
> and after 3 hours and ten thousands of iterations I stopped
> the program without having gotten any result.
> Does anybody of you have an idea of what happened? I didn't
> have the problem when running the Poisson model using the
> same dataset.

It means that the model is too complex for your data, so you
need to simplify your model, either move back to -xtpoisson-
or remove some explanatory variables.

Hope this helps,
Maarten



      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index