Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Sanam P <sanamp25@yahoo.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: How to estimate adjusted survival curves after fitting Cox model |

Date |
Wed, 2 Jun 2010 20:09:31 -0700 (PDT) |

Thank you Maarten for your response I have been able to estimate the adjusted survivals at individual level using below codes using Professor Yi Li notes at Department of Biostatistics, Harvard SPH: http://biowww.dfci.harvard.edu/~yili/lect5notes.pdf **baseline survivals: xi:stcox i.var1 i.var2 i.var3 var4, basesurv(prsurv) predict betaz, xb gen newterm=exp(betaz) gen predsurv=prsurv^newterm However I dont know what should do next to get the adjusted survivals for combinations of the covariates and not at individual level. Regards, Sadaf ----- Original Message ---- From: Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk> To: stata list <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> Sent: Wed, June 2, 2010 5:47:03 PM Subject: Fw: st: How to estimate adjusted survival curves after fitting Cox model --- On Wed, 2/6/10, Sanam P wrote: > I was wondering what is the best way for > calculating adjusted survival curves after fitting a cox > regression model in stata. > > I think in the Kaplan miere method using "sts graph" and > "adjust for " the calculated adjusted curves are for when > all the coefficients are equal to zero which is not be the > best method. I am guessing that you are looking for something similar to an average marginal effect: i.e. a survival curve that averages over the distribution of the explanatory variables. However, what is the the distribution of the explanatory variable in a survival analysis? The distribution at t=0, or at each individual time point. In some sense the latter seems more attractive, but notice that changes in the survival curve then also represent changes in the distribution of the explanatory variables in the at risk population. However, the whole point why we add controll variables is that we want to keep them constant... The trouble is that you are dealing with non-linear models, so looking for a single "best way" is usually not fruitful. You are much better of by considering the different summary statistics possible and find out what it is they say and understand and report why they give different results. Hope this helps, Maarten -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: How to estimate adjusted survival curves after fitting Cox model***From:*Steve Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com>

**References**:**Fw: st: How to estimate adjusted survival curves after fitting Cox model***From:*Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: RE: RE: what does it mean the default for -mfx- is discrete when it is evaluated at the mean?** - Next by Date:
**st: Hurlde models** - Previous by thread:
**Fw: st: How to estimate adjusted survival curves after fitting Cox model** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: How to estimate adjusted survival curves after fitting Cox model** - Index(es):