Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Binary Variables


From   Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Binary Variables
Date   Wed, 2 Jun 2010 18:52:55 +0000 (GMT)

--- On Wed, 2/6/10, Natalie Trapp wrote:
> There are no missing data for the regions and I can most
> certainly say that each farm in this dataset has a different
> value for the fertiliser input because it's measured in
> €.

Well, one of your regions is Paris (ile de france), so I 
wouldn't be surprised if there aren't any farms there. At least
it should be a weird region, which is not bad if it fell out of
your analysis.
 
> I also couldn't sort out how to make the "xtreg" command
> work. It gives me the error "not sorted r(5);", even when I
> sorted the data and then typed the "xtreg" command (maybe
> because there are too many variables or maybe because I have
> cross sectional data?!).

The multilevel structure of your data is that farms are nested
in regions.

Hope this helps,
Maarten

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------


      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index