Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: AW: adjusted r-squared, regress with pweight


From   "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: AW: adjusted r-squared, regress with pweight
Date   Wed, 12 May 2010 18:37:10 +0200

<> 

-fitstat-, part of -findit spost9- by Scott Long and Jeremy Freese, does
return an adjusted r-squared, so this would lead one to the conclusion that
it is not inappropriate.



HTH
Martin


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von David Kantor
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Mai 2010 18:21
An: Statalist
Betreff: st: adjusted r-squared, regress with pweight

Hello.

Sorry if  this is a very elementary matter, or if it reveals my 
ignorance. And sorry if this has been covered before.

If I do regress with a p-weight, it does not display adjusted 
r-squared; it also does not display the table of model and residual 
sum-of-squares and degrees-of-freedom.
But these items are apparently computed, as they show up in the 
ereturned scalars.
Can anyone tell me why this is?

I use Stata 10.1.

Thanks
--David

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index