Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: AW: RE: AW: RE: AW: AW: RE: -ciplot- -eclplot- combine with box-options? |

Date |
Mon, 10 May 2010 14:13:24 +0100 |

Your code does not work for me beyond example 1, as your commands make reference to a variable -sex- which is no longer in the dataset after your -statsby-. But it is entirely possible to tweak a -by()- option so that it behaves more like -over()-: sysuse bpwide, clear stripplot bp*, bar by(sex, compact col(1)) subtitle(, pos(9) ring(1) nobexpand bcolor(none) placement(e)) In words, you can 1. insist that -by()- panels are aligned vertically. 2. move the panel subtitle away from the top of each panel. See also SJ-8-2 gr0034 . . . . . . . . . . Speaking Stata: Between tables and graphs (help labmask, seqvar if installed) . . . . . . . . . . . . N. J. Cox Q2/08 SJ 8(2):269--289 outlines techniques for producing table-like graphs Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Kaulisch, Marc Nick, you are right. I was not not clear enough ( I hope the e-mail-programs show the tabs clear enough): I would like to see the confidence-intervals (boxes) for each of the categories and combination of categories in vertical order. I think this more readable as if the plots for each first category (Cat1) are separately plotted. Especially, if I would like to spot not only differences between one category (Cat2) but also to see whether items in category 1 are different. This is less a problem with "sex" as a by-variable but if I have eight items in a by-var it is very hard to tell differnces... I hope the examples in my earlier post show this... My example 1 shows the categories like this: cat2_1 box Cat1_1 cat2_2 box cat2_1 box Cat1_2 cat2_2 box ... My example 2 shows the categories like: CompCat_1_1 box CompCat_1_2 box CompCat_2_1 box CompCat_2_2 box With By() I get Cat1_1 Cat1_2 Cat2_1 box box Cat2_2 box box Marc -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Nick Cox Gesendet: Montag, 10. Mai 2010 12:31 An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Betreff: st: RE: AW: RE: AW: AW: RE: -ciplot- -eclplot- combine with box-options? My comment was a lament, not a reproach. I'll look at the help for -stripplot- to make it clearer that -by()- is an easy alternative to -over()-. In return, I am not clear what you mean by better interpretable graphs than those generated with -by()-. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Kaulisch, Marc Dear Nick, Thanks for the follow up clarifing opportunities with -stripplot-. I am not as much into Stata that I can adhoc find solutions for two nice-to-haves I would like. 1) Avoid a composite variable for including two categorical variables (comparing sex by agegroup). 2) Better interpretable graphs than those generated with by(). I might miss features of -stripplot- or Stata again. . sysuse bpwide, clear 1) Example with boxplot . graph hbox bp_before bp_after , over(sex, label(labs(vsmall))) over(agegrp, label(labs(vsmall)) sort(1) descending) 2) Example with Confidence-intervals: . tempfile tf1 tf2 . statsby mean1=r(mean) ub1=r(ub) lb1=r(lb) N1=r(N), by(agegrp) saving(`tf1'): ci bp_before . statsby mean2=r(mean) ub2=r(ub) lb2=r(lb) N2=r(N), by(agegrp) saving(`tf2'): ci bp_after . dsconcat `tf1' `tf2' . generate axis = 6 if agegrp == 3 & sex == 0 . replace axis = 5 if agegrp == 3 & sex == 1 . replace axis = 4 if agegrp == 2 & sex == 0 . replace axis = 3 if agegrp == 2 & sex == 1 . replace axis = 2 if agegrp == 1 & sex == 0 . replace axis = 1 if agegrp == 1 & sex == 1 . la de laxis 6 "60+ Male" 5 "Female" 4 "46-59 Male" 3 "Female" 2 "30-45 Male" 1 "Female" . la val axis laxis . twoway scatter axis mean1 || rcap ub1 lb1 axis, hori || scatter axis mean2 || rcap ub2 lb2 axis, hori , /// ylabel(1(1)6, labs(vsmall) nogrid val angle(hori)) /// ytitle("") /// legend(label(1 "Mean bp_before") label(2 "CI bp_before") /// label(3 "Mean bp_after") label(4 "CI bp_after") size(vsmall) rows(2) span) 3) Stripplot (!?) with Confidence intervals: * Generate axis as in solution (2) . stripplot bp_before bp_after , by(axis, compact) vertical bar boffset(0) ms(none) xsc(r(0.8 2.2)) Nick Cox It's a pity that Marc missed a (simpler) solution with -stripplot- that requires no dataset manipulation at all. sysuse bpwide stripplot bp_before bp_after , by(sex, compact) stack vertical bar height(0.2) gets you there directly. If you really want only the c.i. bars, so that the data points are suppressed, that's perverse, but you can do it too: stripplot bp_before bp_after , by(sex, compact) vertical bar boffset(0) ms(none) xsc(r(0.8 2.2)) In short, -stripplot- for two or more variables and two or more groups requires -by()- not -over()-. As program writer, I saw no point trying to re-create a complicated set-up when -by()- does it for you for free. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Kaulisch, Marc Okay, it seems that -statsby- does the trick together with -dsconcat- (ssc). Preliminary without labels etc: sysuse bpwide tempfile tf1 tf2 statsby mean1=r(mean) ub1=r(ub) lb1=r(lb) N1=r(N), by(agegrp) saving(`tf1') subsets total: ci bp_before statsby mean2=r(mean) ub2=r(ub) lb2=r(lb) N2=r(N), by(agegrp) saving(`tf2') subsets total: ci bp_after dsconcat `tf1' `tf2' twoway rcap ub1 lb1 agegrp || scatter mean1 agegrp || rcap ub2 lb2 agegrp || scatter mean2 agegrp Kaulisch, Marc Nick, Thanks a lot for this extensive answer. I learn a lot. I haven't had time yet to go deeper in the opportunities to work with statsby (will do this later). But experimenting with -stripplot- I come very early to an end... I would like to create a graph such as . sysuse bpwide . graph hbox bp_before bp_after, over(sex) over(agegrp), sort(1) descending) But I do not want a boxplot but a ci-bar as in stripplot... -stripplot- does not allow two vars with over. . ciplot bp_before bp_after, by(agegrp) looks closer to my interest... * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: AW: RE: AW: RE: AW: AW: RE: -ciplot- -eclplot- combine with box-options?***From:*"Kaulisch, Marc" <kaulisch@forschungsinfo.de>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Testing equality of odds ratios outside of logistic regression** - Next by Date:
**st: poisson quasi maximum likelihood for cross section data** - Previous by thread:
**st: AW: RE: AW: RE: AW: AW: RE: -ciplot- -eclplot- combine with box-options?** - Next by thread:
**st: line plot** - Index(es):