Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Re: st: Searching for Kullback–Leiber divergence


From   Tirthankar Chakravarty <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: Re: st: Searching for Kullback–Leiber divergence
Date   Sun, 9 May 2010 23:02:41 +0530

Michael,

That, I think, is a slightly harder problem. See here and the references within:
http://www.tsc.uc3m.es/~fernando/bare_conf3.pdf

Most of these references ([21], [12], [5], [22], [13], [18]) are
recent and fairly involved. If you have an algorithm in mind that
would be very helpful in answering your question/supplying you with
code. Eqn (4) in the link above is fairly easily programmable.

However, it would be much easier if I could see what you have in mind
in situ, so a reference to an application would be great.

T

2010/5/9 Michael C. Morrison <[email protected]>
>
> Tirthankar Chakravarty advised that I look into -multigof- for the Kullback–Leiber divergence. Thanks for the response but -multigof- is not what I'm looking for.
>
> Kullback–Leiber divergence is sometimes referred to as 'relative entropy' or 'cross entropy'. The Kullback–Leiber divergence that I need summarizes the effect of location and shape changes on the overall relative distribution involving two continuous distributions. The Kullback–Leiber divergence has a simple interpretation in terms of the relative distribution, and it is decomposable into the location, shape and other components.
>
> I have - reldist-. It  does a great job in plotting relative & cumulative pdfs, location/shape shift changes, polarization coefficients, but it doesn't provide a measure of the overall distributional difference between two distributions. That's where the The Kullback–Leiber divergence comes to the rescue. The advantage of the Kullback–Leiber divergence is that it is decomposable.
>
> Hope this clarifies what I'm searching for.
>
> Mike
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



--
To every ω-consistent recursive class κ of formulae there correspond
recursive class signs r, such that neither v Gen r nor Neg(v Gen r)
belongs to Flg(κ) (where v is the free variable of r).

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index