Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: brr and replicate weights specification |

Date |
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:39:16 -0500 |

In your -svyset-, you should use the fully processed weight rather than the 0/1 variables (Hadamard matrix, essentially) that was provided to you. (I am surprised to hear that anybody could do that; at the data provider side, they have the capacity to produce the fully appropriate BRR weights which would be (original probability weight) times (0 or 2 for the current BRR replicate) times (post-stratification and non-response adjustment specific to the particular BRR replicate) That is, if you do any adjustments of the weights, the similar procedure should be followed with BRR. That the data provider did not do that is odd, to say the least. Anyway, back to your question: you will have something like foreach x of varlist <0/1 weight modification variables> { gen brrw`x' = pweight*2*`x' } svyset [pw=pweight], vce(brr) brrw( brrw* ) You are right that you don't need the stratification and clustering information on top of this. However, if you do have that information, you can svyset PSU [pw=pweight] , str( strata ) and check that you indeed have 2 PSUs/stratum with svydes If you don't, then you would rather want to use the second statement than the first one. Generally, all variance estimation methods are asymptotically (in the number of PSUs) equivalent to one another, so the considerations to choose BRR or jackknife or linearization or the bootstrap or generalized variance functions or whatever have you generally come from non-statistical considerations. Usually replication weights are provided in an attempt to mask the PSU identifiers with the hope of better identity protection of the survey respondents. However providing both strata/PSU and BRR weights in a single data set does not serve that purpose. So it is unclear to me as to what the idea behind these weights is. On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Ian Breunig <ianbreunig@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Statalist, > > I'm attempting to use svy: brr estimation. My data set is the MEPS > data set supplied by AHRQ. MEPS supplies a sampling weight and a > standard set of 128 BRR replicates (= 1 or 0). They instruct to > create replicate weights as BRRwt = BRR * 2 * pweight (where BRR is > an element of [1,128]) then use these as balanced replicate wieghts. > > My question is, when I declare my - svyset - statement should the > brrweight() option contain the BRR1wt calculated above or the 128 > replicates that are equal to 1 or 0? If the former one is correct do > I still need to declare my sampling weight in the - svyset -? > > The [SVY] manual does not explicitly explain this. Does the brr > command create the BRRwt calculated above using the pweight and 128 > replicates defined, or does it use the BRRwt calculated and supplied > by me and then ignore the sampling weight. > > Lastly, I understand from the [SVY] documentation that I should ignore > the stratum and cluster variables supplied by MEPS when declaring - > svyset - when using - brr -. Can you confirm this, or does it hurt to > put those in as well? > > Thanks ahead of time, > > Ian Breunig > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: brr and replicate weights specification***From:*Ian Breunig <ianbreunig@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: destringing and replacing values for several variables** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: destringing and replacing values for several variables** - Previous by thread:
**st: brr and replicate weights specification** - Next by thread:
**st: destringing and replacing values for several variables** - Index(es):