Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: RE: Recent postings for help on course work and theses |

Date |
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:42:03 +0100 |

I don't know if Tony had this in mind too, but either way here is a related point. I've sensed a recent increase in questions of the form How should I approach the analysis of these data? and I intend to do this. Is it statistically (or econometrically) correct? Often such questions have little or no Stata content. As the list subjects are declared to be Stata and statistics, it can hardly be said that such questions are out of order. At the same time, I think many would regret a morphing of the list towards being more of a general statistical list. But many would regard a discussion of statistical issues once a Stata question has been raised as totally desirable and valuable, so it would be unwise to base too much on whether the statistical question came first or the Stata question came first. For the moment, the answer seems to be again to delete what you don't want to answer, but there may be a variety of views on this point. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Nick Cox This question like many others can be addressed by looking at the FAQ. If there is a formal policy -- or more precisely standard advice -- it is explicit in the FAQ. Anything else comes down to personal choice: Delete anything you don't want to answer. Homework questions are explicitly deprecated and people are asked to ignore them. Of course, it is not always easy to spot a homework question. When homework questions do appear, they are often ignored on different grounds. For example, if someone asked "What are the relative advantages of the mean and the median?" there would probably be little response. Most people would mutter to themselves something along the lines of "For goodness' sake, do some reading" and delete with extreme prejudice. Dissertations and theses are surely a different matter. If questions related to thesis work were banned, Statalist traffic would be cut drastically (a wild guess: in half). Besides, there is an operational matter of how we could tell the difference unless posters made it explicit that they were working on a thesis. Besides, again, why is there a difference between helping someone working on a thesis (for which they will claim full credit) and someone working on a paper or report (ditto)? Conversely, Statalist experts whose help is crucial are usually very open to offers of co-authorship. In my case I already have a Ph.D. and don't need another, even vicariously. But I think Tony's sentiment does catch an issue that isn't easy to resolve. In a few recent cases, I have wondered "If we solve your problem, who deserves the mark you get?" Again, the answer is simply to delete what you don't want to answer. Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Lachenbruch, Peter I thought that the list was to be used for help on Stata issues and not for homework or thesis questions. To my mind, these should be the student's work and questions might be addressed to their advisor. In the past few days, there have been a number of such posts, some of them involving a lot of back and forth to sort out the question. If I am mistaken, please let the list know. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: RE: RE: RE: Recent postings for help on course work and theses***From:*"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>

**References**:**st: Recent postings for help on course work and theses***From:*"Lachenbruch, Peter" <Peter.Lachenbruch@oregonstate.edu>

**st: RE: Recent postings for help on course work and theses***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**st: To expand the value of a constant variable across the panel** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Difference-in-Difference on panel data without treatment and control group distinction** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: RE: RE: Recent postings for help on course work and theses** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: RE: RE: Recent postings for help on course work and theses** - Index(es):