Notice: On March 31, it was **announced** that Statalist is moving from an email list to a **forum**. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, **statalist.org** is already up and running.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Markus Hahn <mhahn@unimelb.edu.au> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
st: Question about floating point precision |

Date |
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:37:01 +1100 |

Quite often here on Statalist, there are questions regarding the precision of numbers in Stata. I thought it is again time for such a question. Although I am aware of most of the issues Stata (or computers in general) have with the precision of floating point numbers, there is still (at least) one open question that I have. Consider the following example (just ignore for a moment that I could have used '1/2' instead of '26.07/52.14'): ---------------------------------- . // why is this code more precise . . di %22.18f 1559*26.07/52.14 779.500000000000000000 . . // than this code . . di %22.18f 1559*26.07 4.064313000000000e+04 . di %22.18f 40643.13/52.14 779.499999999999890000 ---------------------------------- Why is the code in the first part of my example more precise than the last part? Is it really more precise or does it only SEEM to be so? What I would like to know is whether the first part is more precise (if at all) because it only uses one expression for the calculation as compared to last part which uses two expressions? Does the indirect calculation introduce this imprecision? Markus * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Question about floating point precision***From:*Phil Schumm <pschumm@uchicago.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: RE: How do I obtain confidence intervals for percentiles with survey data ?** - Next by Date:
**st: Testing of differences in R-square** - Previous by thread:
**st: Identifying interaction effect in probit** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Question about floating point precision** - Index(es):