Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down on April 23, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: RE: -xthtaylor and weights


From   Davillas Apostolos <davillas@upatras.gr>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   Re: st: RE: -xthtaylor and weights
Date   Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:58:21 +0200

<>
Many thanks for your reply. 
I mentioned the default.
Is there any potential explanation for the observed differences in the
significance level of the coefficients 
from the weighted/unweighted H-T estimations? 


> Applying the -xthtaylor without weights resulted to significant and
> insignificant coefficients (various p-values).
> However, after applying [iw], all the coefficients are strongly
> significant (p-values:0.000).

I appreciate any suggestion. Thank you in advance.

Best wishes,

Apostolos
 


On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:57:56 +0100, "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>
wrote:
> <>
> 
> " As far as I  know, the -xthtaylor command allows [iw] or [fw]."
> 
> 
> 
> According to its help file, this depends on the estimator used. If you
go
> for the default, your statement is true, if you want the -amacurdy-
> version, it is not. The dialog boxes are usually also a good way to
explore
> the interplay between options.
> 
> 
> 
> HTH
> Martin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Davillas
> Apostolos
> Sent: Dienstag, 23. März 2010 17:50
> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> Subject: st: -xthtaylor and weights
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> As far as I  know, the -xthtaylor command allows [iw] or [fw]. 
> Applying the -xthtaylor without weights resulted to significant and
> insignificant coefficients (various p-values).
> However, after applying [iw], all the coefficients are strongly
> significant (p-values:0.000).
> 
> Could you please give me any suggestions for this. I appreciate any
help.
> 
> Thank you in advance.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Apostolos  
>  
> 
> 
>     
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index