Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

R: st: AW: ordered probit


From   "fabrizio_ferriani@libero.it" <fabrizio_ferriani@libero.it>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   R: st: AW: ordered probit
Date   Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:25:02 +0100 (CET)

Thanks for your reply.
Please forgive me, you are right, I was not looking the right page. So, I 
guess stata does not provide generalized residuals after oprobit.


FF

>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: martin.weiss1@gmx.de
>Data: 05/02/2010 13.52
>A: <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
>Ogg: st: AW: ordered probit
>
>
><> 
>
>Which "residuals" are you talking about? -help oprobit postestimation- does 
not list any, does it?
>
>
>
>
>HTH
>Martin
>
>
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.
harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von fabrizio_ferriani@libero.it
>Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Februar 2010 13:47
>An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
>Betreff: st: ordered probit
>
>Dear statalisters
>
>I would like to ask you two points about ordered probit:
>
>1)Is it possible to define variables to be included in the variance 
>specification like in the hetprobit command?
>2)Residuals provided by oprobit postestimation are not generalized 
residuals, 
>isn't it?How are they compute?
>
>Thank you for any help.
>*
>*   For searches and help try:
>*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
>*
>*   For searches and help try:
>*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index