[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Alan Acock <acock@mac.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Standardized Beta and Multiple Imputation in Stata 11 |

Date |
Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:31:18 -0800 |

mi estimate, noisily dftable: regress ln_wagem gradem agem ttl_expm /// tenurem not_smsa south blackm, beta

--Alan Acock On Dec 31, 2009, at Thu Dec 52:21 , Martin Weiss wrote:

<>"The way to get those is to standardize all variables in your modelprior to estimating the regression command."Catherine can find technical details in this thread: http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2009-03/msg00115.html HTH Martin -------- Original-Nachricht --------Datum: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:04:51 +0000 (GMT) Von: Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk> An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.eduBetreff: Re: st: Standardized Beta and Multiple Imputation in Stata11--- On Wed, 30/12/09, McDonald, Catherine wrote:There is an option in the Linear Regression estimation to check off 'standardized beta coefficients' in reporting. But when I do this, nothing changes in my coefficients. I don't see any beta coefficients reported-the coefficients are the same as if I did not check it off. Can someone give me advice on this?The reason is probably that the -mi estimate- dialog box "inherrited" that option from the normal -regress- dialog box. I am not that surprised that it doesn't work, because -mi estimate- seems to work with the returned coefficients as stored in e(b), and the -standardize- option does not change that matrix. The way to get those is to standardize all variables in your model prior to estimating the regression command. The question now becomes which mean and standard devation do I use, and I am not sure, though I guess it doesn't matter that much. Hope this helps, Maarten -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/--Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und MozillaFirefox 3.5 -sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Standardized Beta and Multiple Imputation in Stata 11***From:*"Martin Weiss" <Martin.Weiss1@gmx.de>

**References**:**Re: st: Standardized Beta and Multiple Imputation in Stata 11***From:*Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>

**Re: st: Standardized Beta and Multiple Imputation in Stata 11***From:*"Martin Weiss" <Martin.Weiss1@gmx.de>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: ARMA(1,1) with multiple panels** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Standardized Beta and Multiple Imputation in Stata 11** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Standardized Beta and Multiple Imputation in Stata 11** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Standardized Beta and Multiple Imputation in Stata 11** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |