[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: AW: IV Quantile Regression and Test of Equality |

Date |
Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:47:01 +0100 |

<> " bootstrap "IVQRestimates" _b, reps(100) dots" This is not your call to -bootstrap- the command "IVQRestimates", is it? It does not follow the syntax explained in -h bs- (where the command in question goes after the colon). " The other problem is that after using this procedure, Stata does not recognize the quantiles," What do you mean by that? -sqreg- does leave behind the coefficient vector and the associated varcov, so you can -test- afterwards: *** sysuse auto, clear sqreg price weight length foreign, quantile(.25 .5 .75) te [q25=q50] *** Since you instructed -bootstrap- to save only the coefficients ("_b"), why do you expect that a -test- procedure would be possible afterwards? HTH Martin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Francesco Burchi Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Dezember 2009 12:42 An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Betreff: st: IV Quantile Regression and Test of Equality Dear Statalisters, I am applying instrumental variable quantile regression due to the endogeneity of one explanatory variable (endgovar). I am using two instrumental variables (instrument1 and instrument2). I have followed the procedure already highlighted in previous posts, that is: program IVQRestimates reg endogvar instrument1 instrument2 X1 X2 X3 X4, robust predict double IVendogvar, xb sqreg Y IVendogvar X1 X2 X3 X4, quantiles(10,30,50,70,90) end bootstrap "IVQRestimates" _b, reps(100) dots Unfortunately, Stata gives me the message "insufficient observations to compute bootstrap standard errors. no results will be saved" There is clearly no problem of total number of observations since they are more than 6000. I have tried different specifications of the model, but the algorithm still does not converge. However, when I have included just one of the two instrumental variables, it finally produced the results. Do you have any explanation of this? I would be really glad to have suggestions on how to obtain my results keeping both the instruments. The other problem is that after using this procedure, Stata does not recognize the quantiles, thus I cannot automatically run the Wald tests to test the equality of coefficients across different quantiles. Do you have any suggestions on this? Or, could you simply tell me how I could compute the test by hand? Thanks, Francesco * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: AW: IV Quantile Regression and Test of Equality***From:*fburchi@uniroma3.it

**References**:**st: IV Quantile Regression and Test of Equality***From:*"Francesco Burchi" <fburchi@uniroma3.it>

- Prev by Date:
**st: AW: Mixed model: fixed intercept and random-coefficient** - Next by Date:
**st: Using esttab to combine multiple xtmixed outputs** - Previous by thread:
**st: IV Quantile Regression and Test of Equality** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: AW: IV Quantile Regression and Test of Equality** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |