Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: adjusted counts after xtmepoisson


From   "Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: adjusted counts after xtmepoisson
Date   Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:47:46 +0200

<>

Have you thought about the -fixedonly- option for -predict-?


**************
webuse epilepsy, clear
xtmepoisson seizures treat lbas lbas_trt lage visit || subject: visit
margins, predict(fixedonly) at(treat=(0 1) visit=(-.3(0.2).3))
**************


HTH
Martin

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of rlhall@umich.edu
Sent: Montag, 21. September 2009 18:25
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: st: adjusted counts after xtmepoisson

I am running a crossed random effects model using xtmepoisson, after  
which I want to generate estimated counts and confidence intervals at  
different levels of X1 and X2.  The documentation suggests that the  
new "margins" command should be able to handle this -- it is listed as  
an option after xtmepoisson -- but I get the error message: "default  
prediction is a function of possibly stochastic quantities other than  
e(b)".  Using the "force" option only generates the error message:  
"data have changed since estimation"

xtmepoisson y x1 x2 || _all:R_group_j || group_i:, mle
(output omitted)
margins, predict(mu) atmeans


Thanks!
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index