[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: RE: exact command for distance ?

From   Roy Wada <>
To   <>
Subject   RE: st: RE: exact command for distance ?
Date   Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:53:03 -0700

Distance matching requires all neighborhood points.
Your argument is like saying -sum, meanonly- runs faster than -sum, detail-.
If this is the biggest fault you can find, then it must be a pretty good 
Thanks for double-checking all my work. I can now tell everybody that it 
has been looked over carefully by Austin Nichols.
I agree that the help file can be expanded. I can add a few words on what 
it manages to do, although this should be rather obvious to anyone working 
with distances.
> Roy--
> We do seem to be in some sort of twilight zone, a realm of asymmetric
> rules about evidence and civility, but I see no contradiction in what
> I have posted--I appreciate users posting code on SSC and elsewhere,
> and in Laura's problem an easy solution is available (via an unmatched
> merge and a loop over observations) without downloading any code,
Ready for Fall shows? Use Bing to find helpful ratings and reviews on digital tv's.'s&form=MSHNCB&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_MSHNCB_Vertical_Shopping_DigitalTVs_1x1
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index