[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
sjsamuels@gmail.com |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: weighted population size smaller than sample size? |

Date |
Tue, 5 May 2009 19:10:11 -0400 |

-- Ilana, I think that the most likely reason for the similarity of the sample and population totals is that someone normalized the original weights so that the revised weights would sum to the sample size. I think there is a reference to this practice in Lu Ann Aday (1996) Designing & Conducting Health Surveys, Second Edition, Jossey-Bass. This would be done by multiplying each original weight by (sample size/population size). Rounding error would account for the small difference between the sum of the revised weights and the true sample size These revised weights are obviously useless fo estimating population group totals but would give estimates of means, proportions, and regression coefficients identical to those given by the original weights. -Steve On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:00 PM, <sjsamuels@gmail.com> wrote: > -- > > Ilana, The estimated population size is the sum of the weights. The > two totals are close, so it doesn't look like a wrong variable. > Weights can be less than 1 and you obviously have some. You would have > to consult the study documentation to see how if this is possible. In > telephone surveys, for example, they can arise when the same > respondent could have been identified through multiple telephones. In > such a case the base weight is divided by the number of phones. > Perhaps something like that has happened. > > -Steve > > > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Akresh, Ilana Redstone > <redstone@illinois.edu> wrote: >> I am using Stata 9 and have svyset my data with a pweight. The number of observations is 8572. When I run a weighted mean (svy: mean x) I get a population size that is smaller than the sample size (population size = 8545). How is this possible? Is there something wrong with the weight or with how I have svyset the data or something else? >> * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: weighted population size smaller than sample size?***From:*"Akresh, Ilana Redstone" <redstone@illinois.edu>

**Re: st: weighted population size smaller than sample size?***From:*sjsamuels@gmail.com

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: -mkspline- reference** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: RE: -mkspline- reference** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: weighted population size smaller than sample size?** - Next by thread:
**st: Fast calculation of a generalized hypergeometric probability** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |