[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
jjc.li@utoronto.ca |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: loglikelihood and loglikelihood ratio |

Date |
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:44:58 -0400 |

Thanks. Jingjing Quoting Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>:

You definately should not use the -force- option. I was expecting that you were not telling us everything you did. -- Maarten ----------------------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/ ----------------------------------------- --- On Tue, 17/3/09, jjc.li@utoronto.ca <jjc.li@utoronto.ca> wrote:From: jjc.li@utoronto.ca <jjc.li@utoronto.ca> Subject: Re: st: loglikelihood and loglikelihood ratio To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Date: Tuesday, 17 March, 2009, 2:59 PM I am quite sure it's the same 3 regions. Because I just input the 3 regions dataest. I will try to use-force-, then run it again. Thank you. Quoting Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>: > > --- On Tue, 17/3/09, jjc.li@utoronto.ca wrote: >> The previous results is from the estimation of a "7 >> regions dataset". >> >> Then I use almost the same command to do the estimation of >> a "3 regions dataset". The only thing I change is that I >> choose first 3 regions of the total 7 regions and also >> modify the command that related to the dummy varible. This >> time, it gives a negative value. > > Are you sure both models A and E refer to the same 3 regions? > > Did you specify the -force- option in -lrtest-? > > --Maarten > > ----------------------------------------- > Maarten L. Buis > Institut fuer Soziologie > Universitaet Tuebingen > Wilhelmstrasse 36 > 72074 Tuebingen > Germany > > http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/ > ----------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: loglikelihood and loglikelihood ratio***From:*"Lachenbruch, Peter" <Peter.Lachenbruch@oregonstate.edu>

**Re: st: loglikelihood and loglikelihood ratio***From:*Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>

**References**:**Re: st: loglikelihood and loglikelihood ratio***From:*Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**st: NLSUR** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: The use of Obuchowski method in Stata** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: loglikelihood and loglikelihood ratio** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: loglikelihood and loglikelihood ratio** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |