[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Re: Fixed effects regressions with probability weights

From   "Martin Weiss" <>
To   <>
Subject   st: Re: Fixed effects regressions with probability weights
Date   Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:26:41 +0100


Have you considered -xtmixed-?

----- Original Message ----- From: "Leah K. Nelson" <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:22 PM
Subject: st: Fixed effects regressions with probability weights

I currently trying to run a regression with fixed effects using
probability weights.  The data is in a cross section.  The unit of
observation is household, and I am running fixed effects at the village
level.  Sampling (probability) weights are assigned at the household

When I use the command

xtreg y x [pw=weight_household], fe i(village)

I get an error that says probability weights must be constant within each

Is this a limitation of Stata, or is there an underlying econometric issue
with using household-level probability weights and village-level fixed
effects?  If this is simply a Stata issue, is there a way to get around
this restriction using the xtreg command?

I have already constructed village dummy variables and run the regression
including the dummy variables as follows:

xi i.village

reg y x _I* [pw=weight_household]

but I want to make sure that this method (including the fixed effects at
the village-level and the probability weights at the household-level) does
not yield biased or inconsistent estimates.  Does anyone have any insight
on this?

*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index