Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: Re: How does -kwallis2- compute adjusted p-values for significance?


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: Re: How does -kwallis2- compute adjusted p-values for significance?
Date   Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:04:31 -0000

Thanks for this. My central point remains that no-one is likely to
change their help files unless specific weaknesses are brought to their
attention. Just saying that standards are poor won't trigger many
improvements, regardless of whether you are right or wrong. 

Anyway, the trade balance still looks good. You routinely use >40
packages, so they can't be that lousy; otherwise you would presumably
write your own instead. 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Tiago

Thank you Nick and Kit for your feedback.

Sorry about that, Nick.

If I were a native english speaker (or had a few minutes more per day) I
would certainly try to be less "diffuse and exaggerated to allow a
worthwhile detailed reply". Adjusting for these two confounders, I think
my previous message expresses the truth, and only the truth. 

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index