Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: R: About stochastic dominance analysis??


From   "Carlo Lazzaro" <carlo.lazzaro@tiscalinet.it>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: R: About stochastic dominance analysis??
Date   Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:57:07 +0100

Dear Jeetendra,
I suppose that you have already ruled out that curves crossing is evidence
of second-order stochastic dominance (please, see for instance STINNETT AA,
MULLAHY J. Net Health Benefits: A New Framework for the Analysis of
Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Medical Decision Making 1998;18
suppl:S68-S80).

Kind Regards,
Carlo


-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Per conto di Jeetendra Aryal
Inviato: lunedì 1 dicembre 2008 22.45
A: 'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'
Oggetto: st: About stochastic dominance analysis??

Dear statalists,

I have two groups of farm households in my data, say Group A and Group B.
Group A used soil conservation measures while Group B did not. I have data
on yield (total value product per unit area) for each groups. I used
kdensity to examine whether yields on conserved plots dominates the yield on
non-conserved ones. However, the kdensity graphs are crossing each other at
some points and therefore, difficult to conclude.
Is there any way to do it?

regards

Jeetendra Prakash Aryal
Research Fellow
Department of Economics and Resource Management
Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB)
P.B. 5003, N-1432, Aas
Norway




*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index