Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: how to reply on Statalist [was: RE: st: Categorizing HIV status using a series of string variables]


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: how to reply on Statalist [was: RE: st: Categorizing HIV status using a series of string variables]
Date   Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:33:54 -0000

Cheer up, Tony. You did it once, you say. Some regular list members make
many valuable postings yet _never_ -- in some cases as a point of
principle -- ever delete a single character from previous postings. It
is quite common to see postings ending with multiple copies of 

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

Of course, if you read postings from the top you can, and should,
usually bail out before seeing such ejunk. 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Lachenbruch, Peter

The one huge drawback is hitting reply to the digest mail.  That would,
if I understand correctly, have the entire days submissions as part of
the "RE:" transmission.  I think I may have done this once and felt
red-faced. 

[big snip] 


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index