Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: Re: how to reply on Statalist


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: Re: how to reply on Statalist
Date   Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:26:26 -0000

Phil's answer was independent of mine but is highly correlated. Given
one of his points, I'll tweak the paragraph to be added to the FAQ. 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Phil Schumm

On Nov 25, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Polis, Chelsea B. wrote:
> Thanks very much for this response, Nick.  I'm not sure if you are  
> saying that the paragraph below is the entirety of what you plan to  
> add to the FAQ, but I'm not sure that it fully answers my particular  
> question, which is: What is the best way for a digest subscriber to  
> respond to a response within an already existing thread?  Is it  
> enough to simply copy the title of the post you wish to respond to,  
> put "RE:" in front of it, and send a new email to
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu 
> ?
>
> When I tried this above, it appears to have generated "<Possible  
> follow-ups>" above my response, which seems atypical.  Does this  
> have to do with the fact that I didn't copy any of the text in the  
> message body into the body of my response, or something else?  I've  
> tried the same method again with this post (putting "RE:" in front  
> of the title of the post I wish to respond to), but I've also copied  
> the body of your post to see if that changes anything.


To answer your question directly, there is no good way to respond to  
individual messages if you are subscribed in digest mode.  I'm not  
trying to be glib here, but threading is based mainly on special  
headers that your email client (should) add when you hit "Reply" to a  
message (in particular, the "In-Reply-To" and "References" headers).   
Secondarily, some clients (and archivers) will attempt to fall back on  
the Subject header when these other headers are unavailable, but that  
is always a hack (at best), and can cause unwanted side effects.

Personally, my feeling is that if people want to participate in the  
conversation, they should subscribe in the regular manner (and should  
follow good practice when replying to and/or starting new threads).  I  
don't believe this should be a "rule", and I don't get upset when  
people don't follow this -- I'm just much less likely to read their  
message(s).

If you are trying to respond to a message and don't have the original  
(e.g., if you are subscribed in digest mode or if you deleted the  
original from your client), your best option is to start a fresh  
message (i.e., don't use the reply function) and to copy the subject  
header exactly as it appears in another reply to the original post.   
At best, your message will get lumped together with the thread in  
people's mailers (though probably at the end), but that's no  
guarantee.  I have no idea how the online archiver hosted by StataCorp  
will handle this.


-- Phil

P.S. Threading has nothing to do with the body of the message.


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index