[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Stephen P. Jenkins" <stephenj@essex.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: graphing a series of vectors (latent growth curve model estimate summaries) |

Date |
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:45:11 -0000 |

> ------------------------------ > > Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:12:59 -0000 > From: "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> > Subject: st: RE: graphing a series of vectors (latent growth > curve model estimate summaries) > > . help twoway pcarrow ... snip ... > In other words, you must construct x and y variables specifying the > start of each arrow and similarly specifying the end of each arrow. > See also > > SJ-5-2 gr0015 . . . . . . . . Stata tip 21: The arrows of outrageous fortune > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > . . . N.J. Cox Q2/05 SJ 5(2):282--284 (no commands) > tip for using graph twoway pcarrow for graphing changes over time > > That Tip is accessible to all under the three-year window. Nick's recommendation was spot on, and solved the problem. (Thanks too to Austin Nichol's off-list suggestions.) I had looked at -twoway pcarrow- but got deterred by the examples using either vertical or horizontal arrows. And my -findit- and Statalist Archive searches must have been using bad key words! In particular, I missed Nick's fine Tip. The issue was also clouded by data organisation issues. -twoway pcarrow- draws one arrow for each obs in the data, and so the data I had needed tweaking before implementation. For the record, here is something that works. An extract from the data set is as follows: . list , sepby(age_start) +--------------------------------------------------------------------- -+ | age wave pcs age_st~t time time2 pcs2 time1 pcs1 | |--------------------------------------------------------------------- -| 1. | 45 1 52.81 45 45 49 50.09 45 52.81 | 2. | 45 2 52.13 45 46 . . . . | 3. | 45 3 51.45 45 47 . . . . | 4. | 45 4 50.77 45 48 . . . . | 5. | 45 5 50.09 45 49 . . . . | |--------------------------------------------------------------------- -| 6. | 46 1 52.6 46 46 50 49.85 46 52.6 | 7. | 46 2 51.91 46 47 . . . . | 8. | 46 3 51.23 46 48 . . . . | 9. | 46 4 50.54 46 49 . . . . | 10. | 46 5 49.85 46 50 . . . . | The variables age_start time, time1, time2, pcs1, pcs2 were created from the original dta file (though in fact age_start is redundant in this case; it's just that the varname is more meaningful). Observe that the time2 and pcs2 variables are the values from the fifth wave carried back to the row for wave 1. If the data had been in wide form rather than long form, then this might not have been necessary. (Alternatively -reshape wide- may be another way of reorganising the data. I did not investigate this.) Graphs in the required format are then produced using graph twoway pcarrow pcs1 time1 pcs2 time2 More sophisticated graphs, such as in the Social Science and Medicine article cited in my earlier post, could be created using overlays (e.g. collections of vectors for different groups), and/or -graph combine- Anyway, I now have a happy colleague. ... though having solved her original problem, she wondered how to draw the arrowed lines if were they quadratic rather than linear! The answer -- confirmed by Nick Cox off-list -- is that that would much harder. Stephen ------------------------------------------------------------- Professor Stephen P. Jenkins <stephenj@essex.ac.uk> Director, Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, U.K. Tel: +44 1206 873374. Fax: +44 1206 873151. http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk Survival Analysis using Stata: http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/teaching/degree/stephenj/ec968/ Downloadable papers and software: http://ideas.repec.org/e/pje7.html Learn about the UK's new household panel survey, "Understanding Society": http://www.understandingsociety.org.uk/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: stubwidth in table** - Next by Date:
**RE: st: stubwidth in table** - Previous by thread:
**st: A methodological problem** - Next by thread:
**st: Re: testing for heteroskedasticity** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |