[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Martin Weiss" <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: RE: 3 Problems in Panel Data Analysis |

Date |
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:04:31 +0200 |

Fardad, 1) sounds as if you thought Stata should give you some kind of secret test that let`s you off the hook if -hausman- tells you not to do something. -h hausman- certainly mentions -suest- as an alternative, but it is probably not designed to let you circumvent evidence not to apply RE. -hausman- checks for the differences between an always consistent estimator (FE in this case) and an efficient one under the null. If the difference is outside of bounds established by the underlying theory, it will let you know and you should heed the advice... 2) I understand from your reply to Nils that you think heteroskedasticity would invalidate your point estimates, which I do not believe to be true. It does impact your standard errors, though, which can lead to mistakes in inference. 4) -xthtaylor- allows correlation between parts of your covariates and the individual effects ("u_i") while the RE estimator requires that neither u_i nor the e_it are correlated with the covariates. The advantage is that you do not have to find external instruments because the command constructs them from within. Check the entry in [XT] for the details. 5) -xtivreg- is designed to remedy correlation btw covariates and the e_it, while -xthtaylor- deals with correlation btw regressors and the u_i... HTH Martin -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Fardad Zand Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:44 AM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: Re: st: RE: 3 Problems in Panel Data Analysis Hi Martin, Thank you so much for your through answers. Appreciate for your time. In order to clarify your answers, I just have a few questions if you or other people in Statalist can respond: 1- concerning point 1: So, how can I justify using RE (or BE) when the Hausman test is in favor of FE? Is there any test that takes into account the nature and structure of the data in addition to difference between the estimators? How can one check for correlation between explanatory variables and the individual effects u_i, so I can see how biased my estimation would be if use RE? 2- concerning point 2: robust options to my knowledge is a correction for heteroskedasticity problems. But, as you refer in your answer, does it have anything to do with within and between variances and their difference? 3- concerning point 2: More importantly, the robust option is available for only xtreg (to my knowledge). But, how about xttobit? Is there any robust options available? 4- concerning point 3: you refer to xthtaylor. I didn't know about this command (and indeed the method). how would you compare xthtaylor and xtreg RE? What are the conditions for xthtalor to be unbiased? with respect to the nature of my data and the results of the Hausman Test, can xthtaylor be a good alternative? What are the limitations? 5- concerning point 3: how would you compare xtivreg and xthtaylor in order to solve the issue of simultaneity? Are they both overcoming the problem? Thank you so much for your time and patience for answering and guiding me. Good luck everyone, Fardad On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Martin Weiss <martin.weiss1@gmx.de> wrote: > Concerning 1): FE, because of the way it is constructed, cannot provide > estimates for time-invariant covariates, so that might be the reason for > dropped regressors. > > Concerning 2), -xtreg- has a -clustered robust- VCE which seems appropriate > given your observation of stark differences between between groups vs. > within group variance. Note that you can check for these two variance > components with -xtsum-. > > Concerning 3), the lack of instruments can sometimes be overcome with > -xthtaylor- which can remedy correlation between covariates and the > individual effect u_i and at the same time provide estimates for > time-invariant regressors. > > > HTH > Martin * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: 3 Problems in Panel Data Analysis***From:*"Fardad Zand" <fardad.zand@gmail.com>

**Re: st: RE: 3 Problems in Panel Data Analysis***From:*"Fardad Zand" <fardad.zand@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: R: RE: a possible - foreach - question?** - Next by Date:
**st: Re: re: Troubleshooting 'not sorted' and 'not regularly spaced' errors** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: RE: 3 Problems in Panel Data Analysis** - Next by thread:
**st: How to trasfer a dataset from Stata to Excel?** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |