Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: dangerous preserve


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: dangerous preserve
Date   Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:46:04 +0100

I think this is mostly on the level of yes, sharp knives can cut you if
you are not careful. 

As I understand it, 

preserve
...
save 
...

does not rule out a subsequent -restore-. 

But otherwise yes, you can get bitten if you forget what you have done. 

It would be easy enough to write a command that -save-d while it
-preserve-d, but 
you would have to remember to use it. I can't see an advantage in
advising that 
over advising the use of -save- before -preserve- when that's a good
idea -- or indeed over recommending -save- and avoiding -preserve- if
you are going to forget what you have done. 

Nick
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Martin Weiss

I was wondering if anyone apart from me has been bitten by -preserve-? I
recently preserved data, then dropped half my data to carry out some
calculations and later forgot the preserve-status and saved. Now call me
foolish, but in the heat of the action, it is easy to forget about the
status of your data, isn`t it?
So: is there a mechanism to alert me to this danger, and if not, should
there be one?

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index